2001 (3) TMI 376

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The appellants in these appeals are manufacturers of sintered products of steel and copper. The dispute in Appeal No. E/3012/89 relates to demand of duty of Rs. 68,472.26 for the period from 31-3-1986 to 30-6-1986, while in Appeal No. E/524/89 the dispute relates to demand of a total amount of Rs. 2,11,364.75 covering a period from July, 1986 to September, 1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... demands for duty in question cannot stand. 2. After considering the decision of the Tribunal contained in the final order ibid and the submissions made before me on the basis of such decision, I find that the demand for duty confirmed in the Additional Collector's order impugned in Appeal No. E/3012/89 and the demand as upheld in the order of the Collector (Appeals) impugned in Appeal No. E/ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X