9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (3) TMI 1028X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - In this appeal the issue involved is as to whether the principles of unjust enrichment is applicable to a refund claim filed by the appellants for the refund of the duty paid by them on the intermediate products, which were manufactured and captively used by them for their final products. 2. The appellants paid the duty on the seamless ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... garh v. Metro Tyres Ltd. - 1995 (80) E.L.T. 410 (Tribunal) and contended that principle of unjust enrichment is not applicable to the case of the appellants. 4. On the other hand, Shri Satnam Singh, SDR has contended that the applicability of principles of unjust enrichment in the case of captively consumed goods has not been altogether ruled out by the Apex Court in the case of U.O.I. v. So ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e matter regarding the passing of incidence of the duty by the appellants to the consumers, before disallowing their claim for refund on the principle of unjust enrichment, has not been gone into by both the authorities below. This issue cannot be decided by the Tribunal being a question of fact depending upon the evidence to be adduced by the appellants about the passing or non-passing of the inc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
