TMI Blog2005 (7) TMI 599X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... S.V. Parelkar, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Moheb Ali. M., Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. Issue pertains to valuation of imported machinery. The appellant imported one paint circulation system components and filed a Bill of Entry for its clearance. The total value shown in the invoice for the said goods is 154210. The appellants however declared 129220 as the value after ded ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o the seller to satisfy an obligation of the sale to the extent such payments are not included in the price actually paid or payable. Clearly therefore, this Rule speaks of additions to the invoice value if payments are not included in the invoice value. The case on hand stands on a somewhat different footing. The invoice itself includes 25000 towards commissioning and supervision charges. Freigh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ce value for the goods despite the fact that it is separately shown. In a series of decisions including DCM Shriram Consolidated Ltd. v. CCE Mumbai the CEGAT has been holding that payments made towards the sale of goods, be it royalty or licence fee, have to be included in the assessable value under Rule 9(1) of Valuation Rules. The crucial question therefore is whether 25000 paid by the appellan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|