TMI Blog2009 (9) TMI 714X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... both sides. Smt. Pushya Sitaraman, learned Advocate appearing for the appellant states that this is a case relating to re-warehousing of the impugned goods. She states that though the goods were re-warehoused properly on 26-7-2006, initially the Bond Officer had written a wrong date as 27-6-2006. On that basis, the impugned demand of Rs. 12,730/- has been confirmed against the appellants. However, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|