TMI Blog2009 (8) TMI 967X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... bmits that the appellant has already paid the service tax amount of Rs. 66,64,246/- for which the stay application is to stay realization of the penalty of the same amount and the interest. Shri Agarwal submits that there was only delay in making payment of the service tax. But there was no intention for suppression of the material facts. Therefore, the appellant not having any guilty intention to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... brought the appellant to the charges of suppression that was enough to penalise the appellant to the extent of service tax demand. Even in para 17, Ld. Commissioner has analysed the fact and found defiance of law. 5. In view of above specific findings in adjudication and considering that the matter requires thorough examination in the course of appeal hearing about the manner of withholding the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r that till the date of calculation by the adjudicating authority, the interest demand shall be quantified and thereafter till the date of payment the assessee shall calculate interest amount payable and make payment thereof in full. Compliance in respect of the penalty as aforesaid shall be made on 16-10-09 and towards interest deposit, compliance shall be made on 4-12-09. 6. In the result, the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
