9911796707
TMI Blog1973 (12) TMI 84X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rder of the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in S.T.A. No. 58 of 1972, whereby a penalty imposed under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter called the Act) in a sum of Rs. 1,000 was confirmed. 2.. The assessee is a dealer registered under the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957, and under the Act he had obtained a registration certificate. Under section 8(3)(b) of the Act he purc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... High Court and the facts in the instant case were similar. The Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, however, held that in those orders there was no finding that the misuse was without reasonable excuse and therefore the facts were not similar. He held that there was no reasonable excuse for using these colours and chemicals for dyeing yarn of the customers and not using them for the purpose of manuf ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntical argument was advanced before this court in W.P. Nos. 847 and 848 of 1968. This argument was repelled observing that from the wordings of section 8(3)(b) it was clear that the "goods for sale" clearly connote that the goods so processed must belong to the dealer, as otherwise he cannot be said to have the right to sell them. The clause is clear that the manufacture or processing of goods mus ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
