TMI Blog2010 (10) TMI 446X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t they were instructed orally by the Department - Hence, in the absence of any written order from the jurisdictional officer, that is only a technical lapse on the part of the appellants - Hence, the penalties are reduced to Rs. 2,000/- Appeals are disposed of. - E/314/2010 , E/951/2009-Mum - A/610-611/2010-WZB/C-IV/SMB - Dated:- 7-10-2010 - Shri Ashok Jindal, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri H.G ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in a month instead of coming to the office daily, that is why the appellants have filed once in month. He further submits that it is just a procedural lapse for one particular period which does not involve any duty implication. For that error, multiple penalties should not be imposed, and it should be composite under one show-cause notice and prayed that penalties be waived. 3. On the other hand ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|