2011 (7) TMI 890

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Ltd. for appellant Shri S.S. Katiyar, SDR For Respondent Per  Ashok Jindal On 19.05.2011, the appellants were given an opportunity to explain why reference should not be made to the Hon'ble High Court for necessary contempt proceedings for seeking adjournment on false grounds.  2. In reply to the show-cause notice the appellant Shri Rafeeq Ahmed filed an affidavit stating that 'I a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e he was not able to attend their case. It is also stated that Shri A.P. Kolte, Advocate on 02.08.210 has withdrawn his vakalatnama and informed that as the matter is listed on 12.08.2010 necessary action be taken by the appellants. On 04.08.10, they wrote a letter to the learned Advocate Shri A.P. Kolte expressing their inability to appoint another advocate and requested to continue as their Advo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... intention to interfere in administration of justice but due to above cited reasons they were not able to attend the hearing and sought adjournment on non-factual grounds and contempt proceedings be dropped since they have acted on bonafide belief and without any malice intention. 4. Considered the submissions made by the appellants in reply to the show-cause notice. 5. It is a fact on record tha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X