9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (4) TMI 118X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pondents: Mr. J. Narayanasamy O R D E R Heard the learned counsels appearing for both sides. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the first respondent had passed the impugned order, dated 17.2.2012, in the stay petition filed by the petitioner, in F.No.Addl.CIT/Coy.R.I/Stay of Demand/2011-1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the stay petition, filed by the petitioner, on merits, or an order of stay ought to have been granted on certain conditions. Therefore, he had prayed that this Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order of the first respondent, dated 17.2.2012, and to direct the first respondent to hear the stay petition and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f Demand/2011-12, in the appeals filed before the third respondent, had been heard and decided, on merits. Further, there is nothing on record to show that the representatives of the petitioner had appeared before the first respondent and had admitted that the amount of about sixty seven crores is payable by the petitioner, as claimed by the respondent Department. 8. Further, the learned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
