1996 (1) TMI 425

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Court was delivered by S. RAJENDRA BABU, J.-These appeals arise out of the common order made by the learned single Judge, dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellants, challenging certain action taken by the respondents in respect of incentives and concessions, vide Government Order No. CI 121 SPL 82 dated October 30, 1982. This notification grants package of incentives and concessi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tives, one issued on October 30, 1982 and another issued on March 31, 1983. The latter notification did not repeal the earlier notification in force. Thus, both the notifications have been in force. 2.. Therefore, the appellants contend that they are entitled for the benefit under the notification dated October 30, 1982. The department nor the appellants need not look into the notification dated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellants commenced production in their new industries. Thus, the appellants would be entitled for the benefit of notification dated October 30, 1982, and if one need not look to the notification dated March 31, 1983, such benefit will be available to the appellants for a period of five years from the date of commencement of commercial production, in so far the industries lie in Zone II, III .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X