2011 (8) TMI 982

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hary, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER Heard the Advocate for the Appellant and DR for the Respondent. 2. This application has been filed in the appeal arising from order dated 3rd March, 2010 passed by the Commissioner. By the impugned order, the Adjudicating Authority has ordered recovery of an amount of Rs. 66,72,148/- along with interest and has also imposed penalty while denying the cred .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y the service providers to the exchequer. They rely on Board Circular No. 8771/5/2008-CX., dated 17-1-2008 (sic) to justify their claims that they are entitled to take credit of duty paid by the service providers. 5. Considering the facts of case as above, we find that Revenue has not made out a case of revenue loss and Appellant has made out a case for waiver of pre-deposit. The stay petiti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X