2015 (1) TMI 163

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... resan JUDGMENT The appellants are aggrieved by the direction issued by the learned Single Judge to release the goods subject to deposit of 40% of the differential duty and to execute bond for the remaining amount. 2. The goods imported by the first respondent was seized by the appellants alleging discrepancies. The appropriate authority issued a show cause notice to the first respondent. The no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cause notice dated 22 December 2011. The first respondent in the meantime filed the writ petition in W.P.No.16186 of 2014 for a direction to release the goods pending adjudication proceedings. The writ petition was allowed with certain conditions. 6. The only question that arises for consideration is whether the first respondent has made out a case for release of goods pending adjudication proce .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ingly in modification of the order passed by the learned Single Judge, the appellants are directed to release the goods subject to payment of 50% of the differential duty as assessed by the department. All other conditions imposed by the learned Single Judge would remain without any change. The appellants are directed to release the goods within a period of one week from the date of payment of 50% .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X