Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (2) TMI 977

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iled to appreciate that the assessee is not governed by RBI Act or The Banking Regulation Act 1949, whereas it is governed by The Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act and corresponding bye laws.            4. The learned C.I.T ( A) erred in not appreciating that the assessee accepts deposits only from members for the purpose of meeting financial requirements of members and to provide credit facilities to the members as per the bye laws and there are no transactions with general public.            5. The learned C.I.T ( A) erred in not granting deduction u/s 80 ( P) ( 2 ) (a ) ( i ) of Income Tax Act 1961 which is specifically provided to a co-operative society carrying on the business of providing credit facilities to its members.             6. The learned C.I.T (A) ought to have appreciated that the insertion of clause (viia) in Section 2 (24) of the Act does not alter the position as far as deduction u/s 80P (2) (a) (i) is concerned for providing deduction to a Co - operative credit society which is engaged in providing cre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n towards the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. for the proposition of law by referring to para 12 that merely because the co-operative society is required to advance loan to its members, it does not cease to be a co-operative society governed by the Co-operative Societies Act nor can they be treated as banking companies. The activities carried out by the society cannot be regarded to be banking activities as contemplated under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Reliance was also placed on the decision of the Bangalore Bench of this Tribunal in ITA No. 72/Bang/2013 in the case of ITO vs. Divyajyothi Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. for the A.Y 2009-10 in which it was held that the provisions of Sec. 80P(4) are applicable only to credit co-operative banks and not to credit co-operative society. Reliance was also placed on the decision of the Panaji Bench in the case of DCIT vs. Jayalakshmi Mahila Vividodeshagala Souharda Sahakari Ltd. in ITA No. 1 to 3/PNJ/2012 dt. 30.3.2012. 2.2 The ld. DR, on the other hand vehemently contended that the Assessee is a co-operative bank. In view of the definit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned to a taluk and the principal object of which is to provide for long-term credit for agricultural and rural development activities." From the plain reading of Sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) it is apparent that if the co-operative society is engaged in carrying of business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members, the co-operative society is entitled for deduction on whole of the income relating to any one or more of such business. From the reading of Sec. 80P(4) it is apparent that this section denies deduction to a co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. The provisions of Sec. 80P(4) was introduced in the statute by the Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f. 1.4.2007. The explanation to the section defines the co-operative bank and primary agricultural credit society to have the same meaning as assigned to them in Part-V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. It is not the case of either of the parties that the Assessee is a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. It is also not the claim of the Assessee that Assessee is a primary agricultural credit society. If we read both th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to the co-operative society on the whole of profits and gains of business attributable to any one or more of such activities. This pre-supposes that eligible co-operative society can carry on either one of these two businesses or can carry both these businesses for the members. If the Assessee co-operative society carries on one or both of the activities, it will be eligible for deduction. These two activities are (a) co-operative society engaged in carrying on business of banking facilities to its members or (b) co-operative society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members. Both the activities must be carried on by the co-operative society for its members. If a co-operative society is engaged in carrying on these activities/facilities for the persons other than its members, the co-operative society, in our opinion, will not be eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) on the income which it derives from carrying on the activities not relating to its members. Therefore, where a co-operative society is engaged in carrying on business of banking facilities to its members and to the public or providing credit facilities to its members or to the public, the income which rela .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rative society does not fulfil any of the conditions, it cannot be regarded to be a primary co-operative bank. Therefore, in the case of the Assessee we have to examine on the basis of the facts and materials on record whether the Assessee co-operative society complies with all the three conditions. In case, it does not comply with all the three conditions, it cannot be regarded to be a co-operative bank and the provisions of Sec. 80P(4), in our opinion, will not be applicable in the case of the Assessee. Once, the Assessee will not fall within the provisions of Sec. 80P(4), the Assessee, in our opinion, will be eligible to get deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) in respect of whole of the income which the Assessee derives from carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members. 2.3.6 Whether condition no. 1 is applicable in the case of the Assessee, for this we have to look into the bye-laws of the Assessee. The objects of the Assessee in this case are enumerated as under :          "(a) To finance artisans and industrialists interested or engaged in the establishment and conduct of cottage industries, village industr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s given u/s 5(ccv) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 for becoming primary co-operative bank. We may clarify that if the business of the Assessee is limited only to the members and even if it is a banking business, the Assessee will be entitled for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). So far as the second condition is concerned, there is no dispute that the paid up share capital and reserves in the case of the Assessee is more than Rs. 1 lac. Therefore, the Assessee satisfies the second condition. So far as the third condition is concerned, we noted that Sec. 16 of The Karnataka State Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 permits admission of any other co-operative society as a member. The provisions of Sec. 16 are laid down as under :                 "16. Persons who may become members - [(1) Subject to the provisions of Section 17, no person shall be admitted as a member of a co-operative society except the following, namely:-- [(a) an individual who needs the services of such co-operative society [and is residing in the area of the operation of the society] and is competent to enter into contract under the Contract .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... co-operative society and this is not the case of the Revenue. Since the bye-laws of the society permit admission of any other co-operative society as a member of the co-operative society as stipulated u/s 16 of the Karnataka State Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, we are of the opinion that the Assessee did not comply with the third condition also. Since the Assessee did not comply with two conditions out of the three conditions, therefore, the Assessee cannot be regarded, in our opinion, to be a primary co-operative bank. 2.3.8 We have gone through the decision of the Hyderabad bench of this Tribunal in the case of The Citizen Cooperative Society vs. Addl. CIT (supra). We noted that this decision is not applicable to the facts of the case before us. In this decision, under para 23 the Tribunal has given a finding that the Assessee is carrying on banking business and for all practical purposes it acts like a co-operative bank. The Society is governed by the Banking Regulations Act. Therefore, the society being a co-operative bank providing banking facilities to members is not eligible to claim deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) after the introduction of sub-section (4) to section 80P. In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r can they be treated as banking companies. It is also not possible to hold that these activities of the petitioners amount to "banking" as contemplated under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, inasmuch as these co-operative societies are not established for the purpose of doing "banking" as defined in section 5(b) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949." This decision, in our opinion, is not applicable to the case before us because the provisions of Sec. 80P(2)(a)(i), as we have already held in the preceding paragraphs, are applicable to a co-operative society which is engaged in carrying on banking business facilities to its members if it is not a co-operative bank. We have also gone through the decision of this Bench in the case of DCIT vs. Jayalakshmi Mahila Vividodeshagala Souharda Sahakari Ltd. in ITA No. 1 to 3/PNJ/2012 dt. 30.3.2012 (supra), for which the undersigned is the author. While discussing this issue, after analysing the aims and objects of the co-operative society under para 12 of its order, this Tribunal has held as under :                "12. From the aforesaid objects, it is apparent that none .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates