TMI Blog2014 (7) TMI 1091X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The Writ Petition is filed challenging the Assessment Order of the respondent dated 30.5.2014 and to quash the same. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner company was registered under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and it is engaged in the business of providing Facility Management Services, House Keep ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that even though the notice calling upon the explanation of the petitioner was dated 21.5.2014, the same was served on him only on 27.5.2014 at 5.30 p.m. and the impugned order was passed before the expiry of time granted for his personal hearing. Hence, the impugned order is per se illegal and as against the principles of natural justice. 5. Hea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|