2015 (10) TMI 1171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... aju, Commissioner (A.R), Dr. J. Nagori, Authorised Representative Per: P.K. Das 1. Learned Advocate on behalf of the Appellant submits that the impugned order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice.  He submits that the personal hearing was fixed for three dates by one hearing notice, which is contrary to the provisions of Section 33A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... anted and no further adjournment shall be granted as per proviso to Section 33A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.  We find that three dates of hearing were granted by one notice, which is not proper as per the proviso to Section 33A of the said Act, 1944 as held by the Tribunal in the case of Imtiaz Ahmedad (supra).  We have also considered that the Appellant was under BIFR. 4. In view o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X