Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (1) TMI 536

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ts received during the I- Yr 2005-06 vis-a-vis F Yr. 2006-07.", 3. The assessee is a company. It is engaged in the business of software development. The AO noticed that the assessee had claimed credit for TDS of Rs. 1,56,335/-. The AO noticed from the profit and loss account that the assessee had shown income of Rs. 7,40,000/-. The AO was of the view that the income of the assessee was not commensurate with the receipts on which TDS was made as mentioned in the TDS certificates given by the following three companies: i) Indraprastha Power Generation : Rs. 2,70,000/- ii)SECL : Rs. 4.50,000/- iii)Piper War Area : Rs. 17,14,488/- AO concluded that the assessee failed to disclose income of Rs. 16,44,488/- being the difference between th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... absence of any thing contrary being brought to our notice by the learned DR , We are of the view that the addition made by the AO was rightly deleted by CIT(A). Accordingly ground No.1 raised by the revenue is dismissed. 7. Ground no.2 raised by the revenue reads as follows:- "2. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 55,000/- made u/s 40(a)(ia) without considering the remand report of the A. 0. stating specifically that no evidence was furnished by the assessee. " 8. The assessee made payment of Rs. 1,88,155/- towards office rent and maintenance. The assessee also made payment of Rs. 67,671/- as consultancy charges. In respect of rent and maintenance charges AO found that no tax had been deducted at source and ac .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... any objections on this contention in the remand report. Consequently ground no.2 raised by the revenue is dismissed. 12. Ground No.3 raised by the revenue reads as follows:- "3. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 1,22,875/- out of non- essential expenses made by the A.O on the grounds of failure to produce any evidence." 13. AO identified expenses to the tune of Rs. 6,59,188/- debited to the profit and loss account which were expenses towards house rent, printing and stationery and office expenses etc. AO was of the view that the aforesaid expenses were not necessary for the purpose of business of the assessee. AO also observed that the assessee failed to produce books of account bills and vouchers to verify .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates