9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (3) TMI 389X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... andra Shukla and Ravi Prakash Srivastava, Counsels, for the Respondent. ORDER We have heard Sri S.D. Singh, the learned senior counsel along with Sri Nishant Mishra and Sri Prateek Dawar for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Mehta, the learned senior counsel for the Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue assisted by Sri B.K.S. Raghuvanshi, Sri R.C. Shukla, the learned counsels appear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ffidavit should have appeared before the Court but he has not appeared. No reason has been shown as to why Sri S. Bhowmick, Under Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance could not appear before the Court. Non-appearance amounts to contempt of the order of the Court. The respondent was required to appear in order to assist the Court since no affidavits were being filed and the Court w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ESTAT at Allahabad. On one hand, the Ministry of Finance has chosen to fix a time period of one year which has started running from 9-12-2015, and on the other hand, they have taken no steps to establish a permanent Bench. Further, they have chosen to ask the Court to give a reasonable time to vacate the premises. The Central Government had taken a decision in the year 2013 for establishing a Benc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and apprise the latest status in this regard as to how they have pursued the matter with the appropriate authorities. (3) The Commissioner, Central Excise, Allahabad will ensure that the possession of entire red building is handed over to the Tribunal on or before the next date and an affidavit to that extent is filed before the Court. 6. List this matter for further consideration on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
