TMI Blog2016 (5) TMI 123X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of room rent - Held that:- the petitioner has not filed his objections before the respondent, so the liberty is to be given to the petitioner to file his objections. The impugned orders are set aside and the matters are remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration. - Petitions disposed of - W.P.Nos.25973, 25974 and 25975 of 2010, M.P.Nos.1 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 2-3-2016 - M. Duraisw ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the petitioner that he is also paying the Luxury Tax as per the provisions of the TNTL Act 1981. 3. Treating the difference turnover, as suppressed turnover receipt of room rent, the respondent issued Notices dated 18.6.2010, proposing a turnover of ₹ 57,54,327/-, as suppressed turnover, besides proposing penalty at 150% of the tax due for the Assessment Year 2004-2005; ₹ 63,59,165/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r side and taking into consideration of the fact that the petitioner has not filed his objections before the respondent, I give liberty to the petitioner to file his objections. 8. Accordingly, the impugned orders, passed by the respondent, dated 20.08.2010 are liable to be set aside and accordingly they are set aside and the matters are remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
