9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 1427X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dvocate with Sh. Ruchir Bhatia and Ms. Rubal Maini, Advocates, for petitioners , in Item No.3. Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate, for GNCTD, in Item No.2. Sh. Satyakam, ASC for VAT, in Item Nos. 2 and Sh. Rawat, Sh. Sharma and Sh. Amitabh Joshi, VATO, in Item No.3. O R D E R None appeared on behalf of the petitioner in W.P.(C) 274/2010. Heard Sh. Balbir Singh, learned senior counsel for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s with respect to lack of jurisdiction under the DVAT Act to deal with and revise orders made in the past. That judgment is pending appeal thorough special leave and is now in the file of the Supreme Court as Civil Appeal 2079/2012 - M/s. Dharam Pal Satya Pal Limited and Anr. v. Commissioner Value Added Tax and Anr. [hereafter "the appeal before the Supreme Court"]. It was argued that like in oth ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Full Bench ruling should be followed and in the event the Supreme Court makes a ruling, that would govern the parties and bind them. Without prejudice to that course of action, at the same time, the Tribunal should be left free to decide the appeal pending before it. Secondly, the impugned order does not disclose the prima facie consideration by the Tribunal of the assessees' contentions with ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
