2017 (11) TMI 928

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Petitioner : Mr.B.Raveendran For the Respondents : Mr.S.Kanmani Annadurai ORDER These Writ Petitions, which were initially filed before the Tamil Nadu Taxation Special Tribunal, Chennai, as Original Petitions have been transferred to the file of this Court, and re-numbered as Writ Petition Nos.1374 to 1377 of 2006. 2. Heard Mr. B. Raveendran, the learned counsel appearing for the petitio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re, the first Revisional Authority, viz., the second respondent and the second Revisional Authority, viz., the first respondent both concurrently held that the Revision Petitions are not maintainable. 5. I am unable to agree with the stand taken in the impugned orders, in the light of the fact that, the Section 55 of the TNGST Act provides for a remedy for the assessee to approach the Assessing O .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the third respondent, dated 20.02.2003, by way of Revision Petition, hence, the impugned orders passed by the second respondent, rejecting the Revision Petitions as not maintainable are incorrect. Consequently, the orders passed by the first respondent are also incorrect. Further, at the relevant point of time, assessments for the years 1994-95 to 1997-98 were not completed by the third responden .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X