2018 (2) TMI 760

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hew for M/s Karthik Sundaram For the Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas Special Panel Counsel ORDER Heard Mr. Tarun Gulati and Mr. Shashi Mathew, the learned counsels representing M/s Karthik Sundaram, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, the learned Special Panel Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, challenging the order pass .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ds of Appeal, the Department has contended that the Lower Adjudicating Authority passed the order-in-original (impugned order herein) without examining the reasons mentioned in the order passed by this Court, dated 18.04.2017, in W.P.No.3486 of 2016, i.e., without complying with the direction enumerated therein. Therefore, it is contended that the order of Lower Adjudicating Authority (impugned or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd that the impugned order is not consonance with the earlier direction issued by the Court, in W.P.No.3486 of 2016, dated 18.04.2017, and the Department themselves have realized the same, this Court is inclined to allow the Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the Lower Adjudicating Authority for de nova adju .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X