9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (6) TMI 1403X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the Appellant Sri. T.K. Vedamurthy, AGA- For the Respondent ORDER The petitioner filed the present Writ Petition for writ of certiorari seeking to quash the endorsement issued by the 1st respondent dated 08.06.2017 made in No. ACCT/ LVO-220/ S/ R/305 /2017-18 (Annexure-E) and writ of mandamus directing the first respondent authority to issue/permit the petitioner to down load the 'C' declarat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ka by against issue of 'C' declaration forms. Inspite of the said clarification issued, the first respondent issued the impugned endorsement in one line rejecting the request of petitioner for issue of 'C' declaration form without giving notice and opportunity. Hence, the present writ petition filed. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties to the lis. 5. Sri K.M. Shivayogiswamy, lear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t rejecting the application for issue of declaration forms is highly arbitrary and is liable to be quashed. Therefore, he sought to allow the writ petition. 7. Per contra, on taking notice, Sri. T.K. Veda murthy, learned AGA fairly submits that the impugned order passed by the first respondent is not a speaking order and the first respondent will reconsider the case of the petitioner a fresh. 8. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t without notice and hearing the petitioner is a contrary to the law. On that ground alone, the impugned order cannot be sustained. 10. In view of the above, Writ Petition is allowed. Impugned order -Annexure-E dated 08.06.2017 passed by the first respondent is hereby quashed. The matter is remanded to the first respondent to reconsideration afresh, in light of the provisions under Section 15(5)( ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
