TMI Blog2018 (9) TMI 1471X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel (IT) ORDER Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel (IT) takes notice for the respondents. By consent of parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the first respondent dated 22.03.2018, in dismissing the revision petition fil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... filing such revision with such inordinate delay of more than five years is that the earlier Chartered Accountant, who was handling his case, has not advised him to file any appeal or revision before higher authorities. 5. The first respondent having not satisfied with the above reasoning has chosen to reject the revision on the ground that the same is filed with inordinate delay, without there be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aid financial year was not for an amount of Rs. 6,80,348/-. 7. Therefore, I find that even on merits, the petitioner has not made out a case so as to seek for indulgence before the first respondent for considering the revision, by condoning such enormous delay. Accordingly, I find no grounds to interfere with the order of the first respondent. Hence, the writ petition fails and the same is dismis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|