TMI Blog1999 (9) TMI 30X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ollowing question, in respect of the assessment year 1987-88, for the opinion of this court : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-VII, New Delhi, cancelling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act levied at Rs. 1,29,446 by the Assessing Officer for filing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... id bank for recovery of the loan amount. From the documents so filed, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee had denied its liability towards the bank and had also taken up the plea that the suit was barred by time. He, therefore, concluded that the assessee, having denied its liability for payment of interest to the bank, by claiming the same as loss in the income-tax proceedings, had furn ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assessee denied his liability for payment of the principal amount by taking a technical plea that its recovery was time barred. This plea taken by the assessee before the High Court cannot be made the basis for coming to a conclusion that he had made a wrong claim about its liability to pay the interest and that it had furnished incorrect particulars of its income." The Revenue's application und ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nk tantamounts to furnishing of inaccurate particulars in respect of the said claim. It is obvious even from the format of the question that apart from the said stand of the assessee in the suit, no other material or circumstance has been brought on record by the Assessing Officer which may lead to the conclusion that the assessee had concealed the particulars of its income by furnishing inaccurat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
