9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (4) TMI 1370X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not considering the revised computation of book profits submitted by the Appellant during the course of the assessment proceedings and in not adjudicating on the merits of the case. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in making an observation that the appellant had falsely taken the plea that its letter dated 22,01.2015 submitting the revised computation under section 115JB was not considered by the AO merely relying on an office note maintained by the AO to which the Appellant is not privy to. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the AO has neither referred nor discussed in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... income as filed by the assessee. 4. Before the ld. CIT(A), the assessee submitted that during the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed a letter dated 22/01/2015, submitted the revised computation of its book profit u/s.115JB of the I.T. Act declaring total income of Rs. 2,48,07,947/-. It was further submitted that there was an inadvertent computation of book profit u/s 115JB of the I T Act as per the income tax return. The assessee requested the Assessing Officer to revised computation of book profit u/s.115JB of the I T Act as submitted before the Assessing Officer. It was further submitted that in the assessment order u/s.143(3) of the I T Act, the A.O. has not considered the revised computation of book profit u/s. 115JB ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... with the letter. He had also given the reasons for why he has not considered revised computation. The appellant had falsely taken the plea that its letter dated 22/01/2015 was not considered. In view of the above fact and circumstances of the case, I did not find any merit on the submission of the appellant and therefore, Ground No. l is dismissed. 6. Against the above order, the assessee is in appeal before us. 7. We have heard both the counsel and perused the records. We find that the revised computation of the assessee has been rejected by the A.O. solely on the ground that the assessee has not filed the same in the original return of income. This aspect has been confirmed by the ld. CIT(A). We note that the Hon'ble Apex Court in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
