Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (7) TMI 1945

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 03.12.2004. 2. The Show Cause Notice dated 05.04.2006 was issued alleging that the assessee being the service receiver is not entitled to get the benefit of exemption Notification No. 32/2004-ST and have to pay full rate of tax i.e. 10% on the actual freight paid by them. The assessee is availing credit of duty on all types of inputs and capital goods as well as various input services. Hence, they are also not entitled to get the benefit of exemption Notification No. 32/2004 for avaiment of exemption is concerned. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of service tax alongwith interest and imposed penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. Hence, present appeal before the Tribunal. 3. The Ld. Advocate appearing on beh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sed prior to 27.07.2005. The Tribunal (Ahmedabad) in the case as reported in 2016 (10) TMI 459 held that" certificate issued by GTA separately can also be considered as sufficient compliance of the said provisos of Notification No. 32/2004-ST". (Copy enclosed as Annx.-A") (iv) All the GTA were not registered under service tax. So question of their availing CENVAT Credit on inputs/ CG and input services does not arise at all. In such cases, making declaration in their consignment note/ bills is a misnomer. (v) There is no allegation/finding in the instant case that the GTA has either availed CENVAT Credit on inputs/CG & input services for providing their services for the period 27.07.2005 to 30.09.2005. The Tribunal (Mumbai) in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d that this Tribunal in similar situation in their own case, allowed the appeals of the assessee by way of remand, after making the following observation:- 6. Further we find that the issue of abatement from the taxable value under Notification No. 32/2004-ST or 1/2006ST is no more res integra. This Tribunal in the case of Paliwal Home Furnishing (Supra) had observed that the Notification No. 32/2004-ST and 1/2006-ST do not prescribe any format in which the certificate to the effect of non-availment of CENVAT Credit on inputs or capital goods and benefit of Notification No. 12/2003, to be furnished. Hence, the certificates given by the GTA on their letter-heads has been held to be sufficient and the department cannot insist that such cer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates