2015 (8) TMI 1488

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... PER INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the order of ld. CIT(A)-II, Agra dated 28.03.2013 for the A.Y. 2009-10, raising the following grounds of appeal: "1. Because the authorities below grossly erred both in law and on facts in making addition of Rs. 96,69,228/- to the declared income solely on the basis of consent given by the authorized repr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... firm (appellant) 4. Because the Ld. CIT(A) was not justified, both in law and on acts in sustaining the disallowance of interest of Rs. 2,85,000/- in respect of interest free loan and advances to the relatives. 5. Because the Ld. CIT(A) was not justified, both in law and on acts in sustaining the addition of Rs. 1,83,248/- being the interest disallowed out of total interest claimed. 6. B .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ppeal is maintainable since the Assessment Order was passed on the confession of the assessee. Hence, the present appeal before us. 3. The Sr. Departmental Representative submitted that no addition can be made based on confession of the ld. Counsel for the assessee. It was further submitted that the additions were made purely based on facts of the case and the confession made by the ld. Counsel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X