9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (1) TMI 439X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... M/s.Medreich Sterilab Limited holding that Rules 3 and 4 of the Customs (Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules 1996') were only procedural in nature and therefore, though the Application for registration under Rule 3 was filed later on and the Registration granted to the Respondent/Assessee to avail the exemption from payment of duty in respect of import under Bill of Entry No.550344 dated 28.6.2003 under which goods imported in question which were cleared by the Customs Authority on 30.6.2003, prior to the date of Registration under Rule 3 on 14.7.2003, the Tribunal upheld the order of the lower appellate authority and thereby granted the exem ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... essee. 4. Per Contra, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent/Assessee, Mr.Rajesh Chandrakumar urged before us that a Certificate was issued by the Superintendent of Central Excise allowing the Assessee to avail such exemption with respect to the same Bill of Entry No.55034 dated 30th June 2013 on 3.7.2003 itself and therefore even though the registration of Assessee under 1996 Rules was done later on 14.7.2003, the Assessee had rightly availed the said exemption and the Rules in question are only directory in nature and therefore the order of the learned Tribunal is justified in accordance with law. 5. The Application for such Registration under Rule 3 which was made before the Authority concerned of the Excise Department on 14. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt, or indicating his estimated requirement of such goods for a period not exceeding one year. (2) The manufacturer shall also give undertaking on the application that the imported goods shall be used for the intended purpose. (3) The application shall be countersigned by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise who shall certify therein that the manufacturer is registered in his office and has executed a bond to his satisfaction in respect of end use of the imported goods in the manufacturer's factory and indicate the particulars of such bond." 7. We are of the opinion that the learned Tribunal has erred in holding that the Rules are merely procedural or directory in nature and u ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y purpose of Rules 3 and 4 in question by holding that the Assessee is entitled to the exemption for import made on 28.6.2003. There is no dispute before us that the registration under Rules 1996 was granted in favour of the Assessee only on 14.7.2003 and not at any point of time prior to that and therefore we cannot uphold the order passed by the learned Tribunal. 10. The learned counsel for the Respondent/Assessee had also raised a question with regard to maintainability of the present Appeal filed by the Revenue under section 130 of the Act on the ground of issues of rate or valuation were involved and he submitted that Appeal in such cases would lie only before the Supreme Court. 11. The controversy in the present case is not w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
