TMI Blog2020 (2) TMI 1167X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... TMI 917 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] wherein the Court had refused to pass any interim order. HELD THAT:- The impugned notices dated December 13, 2018 and April 25, 2019 should be stayed till June 12, 2020 or until further orders whichever is earlier. Let the matter appear in the combined monthly list for the month of June 2020 under the heading Hearing . - W.P. 11919 (W) of 2019 - - - Dated: ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (W) of 2019 wherein the Court had refused to pass any interim order. 4. It has been brought to my notice that particular coordinate Bench judgment of Calcutta High Court was referred to by the Division Bench of the Jharkhand High Court wherein Aniruddha Bose, CJ had specifically referred to the order passed and differed from the same. 5. Paragraph 9 and 10 of the said order are delinea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as been stayed at ad interim stage. The Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of M/s T.R. Sawhney Motors Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India and another [W.P.(C) 2138/2019 CM Appl. No. 10002/2019 (stay)] has also passed an interim order in favour of writ petitioner in a similar situation. 9. In our prima facie view, the expression instituted in sub-clause (e) would imply the proceeding whi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion of India Ors. in W.P. (T) No.1599 of 2019, OWS Warehouse Services LLP vs. Union of India reported in 2018(19) GSTL 27 (Guj.), M/s. Koenig Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India Ors. in W.P. (C) 5928 of 2019 and Solvina India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India Ors. in W.P. (C) 9264 of 2019 ) , I am of the prima facie view that the impugned notices dated December 13, 2018 and April 25, 2019 sh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
