9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1851X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a, Sr. DR ORDER PER C.M.GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been filed by the Revenue challenging the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-IV, Surat ('CIT(A)' for short) dated 16.06.2014 for the assessment year (AY) 2010-11 passed in the first Appeal No.CAS-IV/52/13-14. 2. Ground Nos.4 to 6 of Revenue are of general in nature. The remaining effective grounds raised by Revenue read ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... irst appellate authority was not correct on facts and in law in deleting the addition made u/s. 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and the interest charged u/s. 201(1A) of the Act as the specified allowance u/s. 10(14)(i) of the Act are exempt to the extent those are actually incurred for that purpose. The ld. DR submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has erred by allowing the uniform ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ITAT 'D' bench, Ahmedabad in ITA No.184-185, and 1066 and 609-611/Ahd/2010 for AY 2009-10. Therefore, the ld. First appellate authority was right in allowing claim of assessee and in deleting the addition made on both the counts. 5. On careful consideration of above rival submissions on being asked by the bench, the ld. AR could not controvert the fact that in the similar facts and circumstances ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ular of CBDT enabling the assessee for non deduction of tax from the reimbursement of allowances on the basis of utilization certificate of employee then the view which has already taken by the Tribunal in assessee's own case supports the contention of the assessee that there was no liability for deduction of tax from the payments made to the employees as uniform allowance. Therefore, in our consi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
