TMI Blog2018 (7) TMI 2109X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... NTANT MEMBER, This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXXIII, New Delhi dated 02.08.2013 pertaining to A.Y 2009-10. 2. The sum and substance of the grievance of the assessee is that the CIT(A) erred in upholding the penalty of Rs. 53,17,370/- levied by the AO u/s 271AAA of the I.T. Act, 1961. 3. Roots for levy of penalty lie in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... k Arora. The Tribunal in ITA No. 6615/DEL/2013 and 842/DEL/2014 has deleted the levy of penalty from the respective hands. On finding parity of facts and circumstances for levy of penalty u/s 271AAA of the Act, we do not find any reason not to follow the following findings of the coordinate bench of the Tribunal which reads as under: "The Id DR has pointed out that the manner of earning of the sur ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|