TMI Blog2007 (7) TMI 703X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... b Inspector Of Police, Circle Inspector Of Police, S.N.D.P. Yogam, Represented S.N.D.P. Sakha Yogam, P.G. Babu, S/O. Gangadharan, - 2007 (7) TMI 703 - KERALA HIGH COURT - TMI - - - WP(C).No. 18767 OF 2007(H) - - - Dated:- 20-7-2007 - Mr. P.R.Raman And Mr. K. Hema, JJ. For The Petitioners: Sri. B. Gopakumar And Smt. Chincy Gopakumar For The Respondents: Sri. A. T. Anilkumar, Sri. A. N. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ons framed by the 5th respondent itself. It is their case that subsequent to January, 2007, the faith in them t which the public had lost as no positive steps were taken to bring the culprits to book. It is admitted that a writ petition as W.P.(C) 11246/2007 was filed before this Court by one Babu and Bhaskaran who are Respondents 6 and 7 seeking police protection. Ext.P2 is the copy of the judgme ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ondents 6 and 7 an agreement was reached, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P8, which entitle the petitioners and other members to visit the Sangham Office to oversee the transaction and the disbursal of the amount so as to inspire confidence in the minds of the petitioners who are the depositors, that respondents are doing the business properly and that no manipulations are made in the accounts. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... greement was reached between the parties and they have no objection in the petitioners' visiting the office for the purpose of implementation of the terms contained in Ext.P8. 5. In the course of the argument, it was agreed between the parties that Petitioners 1 to 5 representing the depositors will be permitted to visit the office of the 6th respondent for implementation of Ext.P8 agreemen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|