2008 (3) TMI 212

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Respondent. [Order per M. Veeraiyan, Technical Member.] - The application for stay which was rejected ex parte, due to default by the applicant is restored. 2. Heard both sides on the stay petition. 3. The applicant is DOLG operator on the basis of agreement entered into between them and IOC and rendering services which is being leviable to service tax as clearing and forwarding service. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cer on the vouchers submitted by the party in support of their claim Accordingly he confirmed a demand of Rs 5 43,618 as against the amount of service tax Rs 94,272 admitted by the applicant to be payable. He also imposed penalties under various sections. 4. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant relied on judgments according to which the reimbursed amounts were permitted to be excluded for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X