1993 (3) TMI 389

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eave granted. 2. The respondent was working as Assistant Manager (Depot) with the Food Corporation of India. He was chargesheeted on March 3, 1987 and disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him. The inquiry officer found the charges proved against him and as a consequence the disciplinary authority by the order dated September 29, 1988 dismissed the respondent from service. He challenged .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ying upon the judgment of this Court in Union of India and Anr. v. Mohd. Ramzaon Khan (1991)ILLJ29SC the High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the order of dismissal on the short ground that the copy of the inquiry report was not supplied to the respondent. 4. It was brought to the notice of the High Court that the law laid down by this Court in Mohd. Ramzan's case was operative .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to approach the Court, in such events, the said decision would not be applicable and the prospectivity is considering these aspects that the controversies which have been buried, may not come out of the grave We do not agree with the reasoning of the High Court. This Court having specifically made the ratio in Mohd. Ramzan's case operative prospectively there was no scope for the High Court to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X