9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (10) TMI 1176X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Singh, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sumit K. Batra and Mr.Manish Khurana, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Sunil Agarwal, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue along with Mr.Tushar Gupta, Junior Standing Counsel for Revenue and Mr.Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocate ORDER CM APPL. 43464/2022 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') vide letter dated 28th March, 2013 was invalid and hence, all proceedings emanating therefrom in one of the cases were set aside. He states that the permission to seek approval and the sanction letter for approval under Section 153D of the Act was by virtue of a single request/ permission, both dated 28th March, 2013. He states that the approval sought by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... presses for stay of the demand. This Court is of the view that the petitioner has the option to file an interim application before the Tribunal. Needless to state, that if such an application is filed, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
