TMI Blog2023 (12) TMI 688X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ehalf of the Corporate Debtor to the Operational Creditor, where replying to the email dated 30.01.2021 from the Operational Creditor it was stated that there is no liability to pay. It was stated in the letter that no charge is payable by the Company on the bill which was raised by the Operational Creditor. The letter dated 04.02.2021 is at page 243 of the paper book. The Demand Notice was issued by the Operational Creditor on 08.02.2022 which Demand Notice was also replied on 18.02.2022 by the Corporate Debtor refuting the claim and the said notice dated 08.02.2022. The reply to notice dated 18.02.2022 is at page 249, where the Corporate Debtor has categorically stated that no amount is due. The letter dated 18.02.2022 is nothing but n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... existing dispute. 2. We have considered the submissions of the Appellant and perused the record. 3. From the materials which are brought on the record, the Adjudicating Authority has referred to letter dated 04.02.2021 issued on behalf of the Corporate Debtor to the Operational Creditor, where replying to the email dated 30.01.2021 from the Operational Creditor it was stated that there is no liability to pay. It was stated in the letter that no charge is payable by the Company on the bill which was raised by the Operational Creditor. The letter dated 04.02.2021 is at page 243 of the paper book. It is useful to extract the following from the letter: The Company received from your Client a bill dated 15th May, 2018 amounting to Rs. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nuary, 2021. 4. The Demand Notice was issued by the Operational Creditor on 08.02.2022 which Demand Notice was also replied on 18.02.2022 by the Corporate Debtor refuting the claim and the said notice dated 08.02.2022. The reply to notice dated 18.02.2022 is at page 249, where the Corporate Debtor has categorically stated that no amount is due. The letter dated 18.02.2022 is nothing but notice of dispute issued by the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority has rejected the application on the ground of pre-existing dispute. We are of the view that no error has been committed by the Adjudicating Authority. 5. Coming to the submission of learned counsel for the Appellant that there are certain acknowledgements contained in interr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
