TMI Blog2016 (3) TMI 1471X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... granted earlier in respect of the appeals pending before it in exercise of power u/s 254(2A) - grievance of the Revenue is that it is without jurisdiction as the extension of the stay results in stay being in excess of 365 days, therefore, in clear breach of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) - HELD THAT:- The stay granted by the impugned orders is for a period of six months from its date i.e. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al would have power to extend the stay beyond a period of 365 days as provided therein. Petition dismissed. - M. S. SANKLECHA And A. K. MENON , JJ. Mr. N. C. Mohanty , for the Petitioner in both the Petitions ORDER P. C. In these two Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Revenue challenges the orders dated 17th July, 2015 and 11th September, 2015 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he impugned order is purely academic. Therefore, we see no reason to entertain the Petitions. 3. Be that as it may, the issue as mentioned herein above, is no longer res integra so far as this Court is concerned in view of the decision of this Court in CIT v/s. Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd. (Writ Petition (L) No.3437 of 2015) rendered on 16th December, 2015. In the above case, this Court ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
