9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (10) TMI 1398X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... For the Respondents : Mr. S.V. Raju, Sr. Advocate (ASGI), Mr. Amit Kr. Das, Advocate, Mr. Shivam Utkarsh Sahay, Advocate, Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Swati Shalini, Advocate, Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advocate, Mr. Sahay Gaurav Piyush, Advocate, Mr. Pritam Mandal, Advocate, Mr. Siddharth Jain, Advocate. ORDER Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this Court passed the following, (P ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... refrom. The petitioner has also prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs restraining the respondents, their Officers, etc. to forebear from acting or from giving any further effect to the summons, as described above. Rule nisi is prayed to be issued for the aforesaid three prayers. 2) We had heard the matter in the hybrid mode on 11.10.2023. On that date, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the parties, the matter is again listed today and taken up in hybrid mode. 5) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate representing the petitioner, virtually, submitted that the summons dated 07.08.2023 asking the petitioner to appear on 18.08.2023 is bad in law, as there is no predicate offence against the petitioner and no case has been registered. He also drew attention of this Court to paragraph ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ready elapsed and, therefore, at present this Court should not interfere in the matter, because no substantial relief can be granted to the petitioner. Only an academic discussion is not to be resonated to in by the Court so that valuable time of the Court is not wasted. 7) In view of aforesaid submissions and the settled position of law that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary' ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
