Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1973 (6) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... possibly be extracted therefrom by slaughter-tapping and whether the latter is assessable as agricultural income in the bands of the owner who sold the trees ? 2. Whether the income attributed to the centrifugal process, etc., is assessable as agricultural income ? 3. Whether in the absence of a machinery to harmonise and reconcile the assessment and fixation of the quantum of assessable income and apportioned expenditure under the State and Central enactments, the agricultural income-tax department is justified in not following or ignoring the basis and assessment of the Central income-tax authorities and disallow legitimate expenditure apportioned to it by adopting different methods, inconsistent with and rejected by the Central inco .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... udgment here: "For the relevant accounting period for the year 1962-63, the assessee received Rs. 32,250 pursuant to the agreement, annexures 'D' and 'D-1' and for the assessment year 1963-64 a sum of Rs. 45,750 pursuant to the agreement, annexure 'D'. The Tribunal has assessed for the two years these amounts treating the entirety of these amounts as agricultural income of the assessee. The question is whether the whole of the above amounts can be treated as agricultural income. On a reading of the two agreements there can be no doubt that the amounts that have to be paid by those who entered into agreements with the assessee represent payments for permitting them to take the latex as well as for permitting them to cut and remove the tree .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dan Nair J. have been set out in another case decided by us today [I.T.R. No. 16 of 1972--K. C. Jacob v. Agricultural Income-tax Officer [1977] 110 ITR 402 (Ker)] as follows: "(i) The consideration paid by the purchaser allowed to 'slaughter-tap' represents payment for permission to take latex as well as for permission to cut and remove the trees. (ii) There is an element of payment towards capital, namely, the value of the trees which are ultimately to be cut down. (iii) There is also payment towards latex which represents agricultural income. (iv) The amount of consideration received by the owner for the permission given by him to 'slaughter-tap' and to cut and remove the trees is to be bifurcated into that pertaining to latex, an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates