9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (5) TMI 848X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ER PER 1. Petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed against the Order dated 2.3.2020 of learned ASJ, who vide Order dated 2.3.2020 in an application under Section 439 (2) CrPC filed by the petitioner for recall of the Order dated 11.09.2019, rejected the challenge to the Order of the learned CMM granting bail to the respondent. 2. It is submitted that the Respondent along with th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... atement of the counsel for the petitioner that all these cases are not the cases, but are the only inquiries and in none of the cases Complaint has been filed. It was further observed by learned ASJ that these some of these Enquiries pertain to year 1993 and 1996 but there is no Complaint filed and thus, it cannot be considered as previous involvement of the respondent. It was clear from the Order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 18 M/s. Accturist Overseas (OPC) Pvt. Ltd. Mis Horrens Exim, M/s. Sparx Exports, M/s. Shree Shyam Enterprises. 3.Customs June 2019 M/s. Accturist Overseas (OPC) Pvt. Ltd. M/s Horrens Exim, Mis Sparx Exports, M/s Shree Shyam Enterprises 4. DRI (HQ) April 1993 M/s. Chopra Associated Sanjay Gandhi Transport Nagar, New Delhi 5. DRI (HQ) 2014-15 & 2015-16 Fraudulent availment o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... han Singh Vs. State of NCT of Delhi decided on 10.08.2020, P. Chidambaram Vs. Enforcement Directorate Crl. Appeal No.1430/2019 decided on 05.09.2019, State of Gujarat vs. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal (1987) 2 SCC 364 and various other judgments. 9. Learned counsel on behalf of the respondent has contested the Application and has submitted that though there was involvement of the respondent in some c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ail Order. 12. Submissions heard and record perused. 13. Essentially the learned MM after considering the totality of facts, has granted bail to the Respondent. There is no ground shown that the discretion has not been exercised judiciously. The learned ASJ before whom the previous involvement had been agitated, has duly considered the same. Some of the prosecutions claimed by the Department are ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
