1994 (9) TMI 97

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ts and bolts falling under Item 52 of Customs and Excise Tariff, was issued show cause notice by the Assistant Collector as to why the valuation of sale of the goods, whether excisable or not, may not be included for determining the total value of sales of the appellant. The appellant was further directed to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed as it had wrongly declared the aggregat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unal. 2. Shri A.K. Sinha, the learned counsel for the appellant assailed both the findings and urged that the value of sales of exempted items could not be aggregated with the sale of nuts and bolts to determine if the value of sales exceeded specified limit is concerned. The submission does not appear to have any merit. A notification granting exemption to a particular item does not result in r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h slight narrow diameter resulted in change of form and shape and since this transformation of round bars into bright bars resulted in bringing out a distinct and different commodity, the appellant was liable to pay duty on it. This finding does not appear to be correct in law as in absence of any material on record or any finding by the Tribunal that mere drawing of a round bar through a slight n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X