Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2002 (3) TMI 61

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed by the Collector of Customs, Bombay, challenging confiscation of goods in exercise of powers under Section 122 read with Section 111(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 (Act for short), giving an option to the petitioners/importers under Section 125 of the Act to pay fine and penalty in lieu of confiscation. 2.Petitions are different but the issue involved is identical based on common facts. So a sing .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... -5-1987 passed an order confiscating goods and imposed redemption fine of Rs. 3,60,000/- and penalty of Rs. 50,000/- for each Bill of Entry. Submissions 4.A short submission of the petitioners in both the petitions is that at the time of import they were holding import licence to import electroplating salts and brighteners. Sodium Saccharine is nothing but property containing electroplating salt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e public notice specifically excluded Sodium Cyanide, as such, intention of the respondent was to exclude Sodium Cyanide but not Sodium Saccharine. Had it been so, sodium Saccharine would also have been specifically excluded in the public notice. Since Sodium Saccharine has not been excluded, the same can be categorically treated as electroplating salts and brighteners. 5.The learned Counsel for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e it cannot be deemed to be included in Electroplating salts and Brighteners, though conceivably it may be such an item." The findings recorded by this Court in the case of the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3332 of 1988 having become final and conclusive for want of further challenge at the instance of the petitioner, will certainly operate as res judicata against the petitioner in Writ Petitio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... included in electroplating salts and brighteners. Sodium Saccharine is not used as one of the brighteners as contended by the petitioner pursuant to the import policy quoted by the petitioner. The import licence did not cover importation of saccharine, but covered only item described as electroplating salts and brighteners. As such, we are unable to accept the contention advanced by the petitioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates