Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2005 (1) TMI 222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... filed by Shri Sunil Kapoor, the issue involved is whether any penalty is imposable on him under Sec. 114 of the Customs Act. 2. Shri Bipin Garg, learned Advocate, mentioned that the appellant is a bona fide trader of ready-made garments, the price of which ranges between Rs. 30/- to Rs. 40/- per piece; that the appellant had supplied some consignments of ready-made garments to one Shri Dheeraj S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... piece for the purpose of export. The learned Advocate submitted that the appellant had not contravened any provision of law and as such no penalty is imposable on him; that there is no evidence to show that any benefit drawn by Dheeraj Sharma by claiming excess amount of drawback would have gone to the appellant; that as he has not to gain anything by the fraud committed by Shri Dheeraj Sharma, no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... other persons were to get under DEPB Scheme from the Government. Finally, the learned Advocate, submitted that due to some dispute between him and Shri Dheeraj Sharma regarding payment, he had filed a criminal application against Shri Dheeraj Sharma and mentioned that due to that reason he had been implicated falsely. 3. Countering the arguments, Smt. K.A. Mishra, learned SDR, submitted that it h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion furnished by the exporter or manufacturer under this Act in relation to the fixing of rate of drawback, shall be liable for confiscation. Section 114 of the Customs provides for imposition of penalty on the person who abets the doing of such an act. In the present matters, it has not been disputed by the appellant that he had supplied the impugned goods at a rate around Rs. 37/- per piece and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... harma in preparing the Shipping Bills showing the inflated price. Similarly in the case of Yash Exports INC (supra), no vital role was attributed to the appellant no. 2. We, however, agree with the learned Advocate that the penalty imposed is on the higher side. In the interest of justice, we reduce the penalty to Rs. 50,000/- in each appeal. Both the appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Case .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates