Whether a challenge to an arbitration award (or arbitral ...

Supreme Court Rules Against Simultaneous Challenges in Multiple Courts for Arbitration Disputes.

January 20, 2014

Case Laws Companies Law SC

Whether a challenge to an arbitration award (or arbitral agreement, or arbitral proceeding), wherein jurisdiction lies with more than one court, can be permitted to proceed simultaneously in two different courts - Held No - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whether a challenge to an arbitration award (or arbitral ...

Supreme Court Rules Against Simultaneous Challenges in Multiple Courts for Arbitration Disputes.

January 20, 2014

Case Laws Companies Law SC

You may also like:

Dishonour of Cheque - Effect of arbitration proceedings - The High Court referred to a Supreme Court judgment which clarified that arbitration proceedings and...

The Supreme Court held that at the stage of Section 11 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the referral courts need only examine whether the...

HC held disputes between partners of LLP and the LLP itself are arbitrable under the arbitration agreement in LLP Agreement, even when LLP is not a signatory. The First...

The Supreme Court examined a challenge u/s 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an arbitral award and the grant of conditional stay on its execution....

The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 aims to settle tax disputes. The term "appeal" under the Act includes writ petitions challenging tax orders, as per Supreme...

The High Court addressed the jurisdictional conflict between Civil Court and NCLT/NCLAT in a dispute over share transfer/title. The plaint was rejected based on SPA's...

The High Court addressed various issues in a challenge to a final arbitration award u/s 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute involved deductions...

Appointment of Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties to the present lis - interpretation of the terms of the contract between the parties - The...

The legality and validity of the termination of arbitral proceedings u/s 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The Supreme Court found no evidence of...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council to refer disputes between the parties for arbitration under the 2006 Act....

The High Court exceeded its limited jurisdiction u/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by undertaking a detailed examination of the factual matrix and...

The SC held that Indian courts have jurisdiction to appoint arbitrators under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, despite conflicting clauses in...

Arbitration application allowed u/s 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court's role limited to determining existence of arbitration agreement and not...

Initiation of CIRP - It is pertinent to note that on 09.07.2016, ‘prior to the issuance of the Demand Notice under Section 8 of the Code’, the ‘Operational Creditor’...

SC held that a dispute can be referred to arbitration even after an insured party signs a discharge voucher. The court emphasized the Kompetenz-Kompetenz doctrine, which...

Quick Updates: