Revised return incorporating the merger - since there is a ...

Second Revised Tax Return Post-Merger Rejected Due to Late Filing Beyond Section 139(5) Deadline; No Exceptions Allowed.

March 30, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revised return incorporating the merger - since there is a limitation provided under section 139(5) which cannot be ignored, we have to hold that the second revised return filed was beyond the time-limit prescribed. We cannot direct the Assessing Officer or the Dispute Resolution Panel to consider the same, when the law itself does not permit the same - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revised return incorporating the merger - since there is a ...

Second Revised Tax Return Post-Merger Rejected Due to Late Filing Beyond Section 139(5) Deadline; No Exceptions Allowed.

March 30, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

Revision of ITR - All period of limitations has been over - ultimately justice has to be rendered as nobody's income has to be taxed twice. Only re-course available in...

Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

The CBIC clarified that late fee under section 47(2) of the CGST Act applies to delayed filing of complete annual returns under section 44, which includes both FORM...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

The High Court rejected the condonation of delay in filing income tax returns, as the returns were handled by a Chartered Accountant who could not take timely steps due...

Petitioner cannot evade penalty u/s 22(5) of TNVAT Act, 2006 by paying tax after inspection but before assessment order. Rule 7(9) of TNVAT Rules, 2007 prohibits filing...

The taxpayer filed an original return which was processed by the CPC. Subsequently, a revised return was filed u/s 139(5) with a self-assessment tax of Rs. 10,820/-....

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

CBDT extends due date for filing Income Tax Returns and Tax Audit Reports

Filing of revised return - time limit for filing of revised return - Rule 7B of Service Tax Rules-1994 - the revenue authorities have failed to consider the aspect of...

Scope of section 80A(5) - Revised return was not permissible and revised return of revised return is not thought of by the legislature. Thus, u/s 139(5) once return is...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - revised returns were not valid returns u/s 139(5) and that, such returns were not voluntarily filed rather the same were filed only after...

Quick Updates: