Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the addition made by the Assessing ...

Income Tax

September 23, 2015

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the addition made by the Assessing Officer was specific and assessee had concealed the income and furnished inaccurate particulars of income. - the assessee's explanation is not bonafide - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the addition made by the Assessing ...

Income Tax

September 23, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able to prove that the assessee was guilty of fraud or gross or willful negligence, penalty cannot be sustained - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income has not been made out against the assessee. - Though, similar disallowances were made by...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Quick Updates: