Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of ...

Income Tax

April 20, 2013

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of ...

Income Tax

April 20, 2013

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Though section 69B is a deeming fiction but in the matter of penalty proceedings, such deeming fiction cannot be extended so as to hold assessee...

Penalty u/s 27(1)(c) - invocation of provisions of Section 263 - while the Pr.CIT could well initiate penalty u/s 271(1) if he proposed to effect modifications to the...

Revision u/s 263 to impose a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT merely set aside the assessment order in its entirety and remanded the case for a fresh consideration by the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able to prove that the assessee was guilty of fraud or gross or willful negligence, penalty cannot be sustained - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Quick Updates: