Maintainability of petition for recovery suit by the company who ...

Court Rules Recovery Suit Invalid Due to Non-Existent Company at Filing Time; Incorporation Revoked and Later Restored.

September 25, 2015

Case Laws Companies Law HC

Maintainability of petition for recovery suit by the company who was not exiting at the time of filing of suit - its incorporation was revoked earlier and restored later - The petitioner was not in existence as on the date of institution. The petition was hence not maintainable. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of petition for recovery suit by the company who ...

Court Rules Recovery Suit Invalid Due to Non-Existent Company at Filing Time; Incorporation Revoked and Later Restored.

September 25, 2015

Case Laws Companies Law HC

You may also like:

Assessment against a company which was non-existent is invalid - AT

The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated against the non-existent amalgamating company. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki...

Assessment against non existent company - name of company struck off by ROC - Assessment based on Seized Materials - The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer was...

Suit decreed partially for recovery, doctrine of lis pendens applied. Agreement dated 17.08.1990 not found fraudulent or result of collusion between plaintiff and...

Time Limitation - Rejection of appeal filed by the petitioner - Physical copies being submitted on 24.04.2023, beyond the condonable period while electronic filing was...

HC ruled that the period from 13th March 2018 to 26th November 2019 shall be excluded in computing the limitation period for suit filing under Section 14 of Limitation...

Validity of assessment against non existent company - amalgamation proceedings concluded - the assessment order passed on a non-existent Company is bad in law, inasmuch...

Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

Suit for recovery of dues - Jurisdictional bar on the civil court in deciding the suit instituted by the original plaintiff by virtue of Section 22(1) of the Sick...

Companies are required to file Form CSR-2 separately on or before December 31, 2024, after filing Form AOC-4, AOC-4-NBFC (Ind AS), or AOC-4 XBRL for the financial year...

Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

SC upheld the jurisdictional bar under Section 69(1) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, rendering the suit by partners of an unregistered partnership firm for money...

Suit dismissed. Plaintiff company's suit seeking possession and permanent injunction rejected. HC granted permanent injunction against plaintiff barring reliance on sale...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of physical/manual filing of appeal u/s the Income Tax Rules. Assessee argued inability to e-file due to lack of...

Filing of Form GST TRAN-1 - time limit for filing of the form - The time limit stipulated under Rule 117 of the Rules is not ultra vires of the Act. This Rule is...

Quick Updates: