Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - it is unfortunate ...

Refund Claim Denied: 20-Year Legal Battle Over Rs. 92,111 Citing Unjust Enrichment Principle.

October 13, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - it is unfortunate that for a small amount of ₹ 92,111/-, the appellant has been fighting the case for about last 20 years. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - it is unfortunate ...

Refund Claim Denied: 20-Year Legal Battle Over Rs. 92,111 Citing Unjust Enrichment Principle.

October 13, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund of Excess Excise Duty - principles of unjust enrichment - the provisional assessment was directed in the year 1995 and relevant documents for finalisation of...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund claim u/s 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1994 was partially allowed. Refund of Rs. 20,52,143/- and Rs. 2,19,004/- granted,...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment - There is no provision in the Central Excise law that the state government authorities would be are outside of the principles...

Refund claim rejected – Unjust enrichment - the appellant’s have not recovered the amounts of duties from their customers so as to attract the unjust enrichment principles - AT

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods as ''wireless telephone'' - The Tribunal's findings indicated that the appellant had paid duty without...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Quick Updates: