Refund claim - payment of service under protest - Merely on ...

Refund Claim Invalid Without Specifics: Quantification and Deposit Period Required for Service Tax Paid Under Protest.

June 3, 2016

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Refund claim - payment of service under protest - Merely on requesting the Superintendent to refund the service tax, without even quantifying the same and without even referring to the period during which the same was deposited, especially when they continued to pay in future awaiting the decision of the HC cannot be considered to be a refund application - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - payment of service under protest - Merely on ...

Refund Claim Invalid Without Specifics: Quantification and Deposit Period Required for Service Tax Paid Under Protest.

June 3, 2016

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Detailed process outlined for Canteen Store Department (CSD) to file refund application FORM GST RFD-10A on GST portal for refund of tax paid on inward supply of goods....

Refund of SAD - refund claims filed without requisite documents - Undisputedly the necessary documents which were required for filing this refund application were under...

Claim of interest on delayed refund, from the date of deposit till the refund of the pre-deposit of principal amount - the assessee is entitled to claim interest from...

The case pertains to the interpretation of amended provisions of Sections 35F and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding eligibility for interest on pre-deposit...

Refund claim - Period of limitation - Double Taxation - The respondent had also paid tax on the same invoices. - The petitioner sought direction for the refund of Input...

CESTAT denied interest claim on pre-deposit refund made u/s 35F of Central Excise Act. Pre-deposit from 2012 was refunded in 2018 post-favorable appeal outcome. While...

HC allows petitioner's claim for input tax credit (ITC) refund on zero-rated services, holding that registration without specific service category details does not...

Rejection of refund of cash security deposit - Period of limitation - it is very much clear that refund claim of the security deposit is not governed by the provisions...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

Refund claim of amount deposited during investigation - the appellant is entitled to refund with interest under Section 35 FF, for which no limitation is applicable. The...

Refund of utilized input tax credit - rejection of claim for refund - When the law requires that no application for refund shall be rejected without giving the applicant...

The court held that the assessee was entitled to refund of Rs. 3,50,00,000/- deposited with the department, along with statutory interest and interest on refunds. The...

Refund of service tax - amount have been deposited by mistake - Form 26AS, VAT-41, copies of challans and copies of running bills prepared by the Housing Board showing...

Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

Quick Updates: